An Award :)

Sassy Brit from Alternative-Read has been kind enough to forward on the 'Proximidade' award to me.

This blog invests and believes in the Proximity - nearness in space, time and relationships. These blogs are exceedingly charming. These kind bloggers aim to find and be friends. They are not interested in prizes or self-aggrandizement! Our hope is that when the ribbons of these prizes are cut, even more friendships are propagated. Please give more attention to these writers! Deliver this award to eight bloggers who must choose eight more and include this clever-written text into the body of their award.

I am forwarding it on to :

  1. claire @ kissacloud
  2. Megan @ writemeg
  3. Jackie @ farmlanebooks
  4. Iliana @ bookgirl.net
  5. Mish @ stageandcanvas
  6. Jodie @ bookgazing
  7. caite @ caitesdayatthebeach
  8. bluestocking @ bluestocking_bb

Thanks, for making blogging so much more fun!

And thanks again, Sassy Brit! :)

Terry Pratchett - A Hat Full Of Sky

Background:

This book was picked up as part of the Take A Chance Challenge - Random Word Selection. The word I picked out was 'sky', and I entered the word in Amazon. The second result I got was A Hat Full Of Sky, and it was an easy decision. I've never read a Terry Pratchett book before, but I've had wonderful things about his books, and figured, this is a golden opportunity handed over to me on a silver plate. How can I refuse? It was a great start to the challenge, for I loved the book, and am going to try reading more of Pratchett. So, if you have any recommendations, please let me know.

Review:

This is the sequel to The Wee Free Men, and it follows Tiffany Arching's adventures, this time with her being an apprentice to research witch, Miss Level. Tiffany, still relatively new to the world of witches, hopes to learn from her employer, and become a fully qualified witch, during her apprenticeship. However, things don't quite pan out that way, as she helps Miss Level take care of the needy in the village, without actually using any magic. Miss Level says a witch doesn't always need to do magic. All a witch needs to do is not 'go to the bad side'.

However, Tiffany has one trick, which she hasn't shared with anyone yet - she can step out of her body at will, leaving it an empty vessel. What she doesn't know is, an ancient and bodiless spirit (a hiver) is just waiting to inhabit her body, and take over. And so it does. What ensues is drama, as the cleverest of witches (Granny Weatherwax, Miss Level) and the Nac Mac Feegles (a wee fairy race (they are extremely tiny), who protect Tiffany, from the time she acted as their 'Kelda' - this was done in the previous book of the series) attempt to get rid of the hiver, and bring the real Tiffany back, before the hiver takes over completely, and Tiffany is lost forever, in her body. At the same time, the hiver's disregard for anything moral coupled with Tiffany's powers wreaks havoc, as she turns a man into a toad, 'borrows' Miss Level's broomstick, and goes on an expensive shopping spree which, without her powers, she'd never be able to afford... she's turning over to the 'bad side'.

This is a well-written page-turner, which has oodles of dry humor. The characters are extremely well-drawn, and one cannot help but associate with all of them, from Tiffany to the Nac Mac Feegles (who are probably the best drawn out group). Despite the Nac Mac Feegles being drunken thieves, you admire them being loyal and good=hearted, while simultaneously appreciating the lack of conscientiousness. There's a part in the book where Miss Level is horrified that they're talking about invading her body, to get the hiver out, for it would mean invading her privacy. They reply saying they've already read her diary, and if it was that personal, she wouldn't keep it in the sock drawer. And when Tiffany goes on a perilous mission, one of the Nac Mac Feegles joins her, saying he's promised his wife that he'd help her eliminate the hiver.

As you'd expect for any children/young adult book, it demarcates between good and bad, courage and cowardice, loyalty and flippancy. The obnoxious fall, and the good rise to the occasion to help. So, the feel-good affect that this book has is an added bonus.

Rating: 4

So Much To Do, So Little Time

Time - it's the one thing I always seem to be running out of (excluding a fresh pair of socks). I have a to do list a mile long, and I'm going to start by ticking some things off this weekend. On the blogging front, I started early, finishing two outstanding book reviews, and one Q&A post from the Weekly Geeks two weeks back. Not bad for a hard day's night! Reviews completed:

1. Sebastian Barry - The Secret Scripture 2. Sophie Kinsella - The Undomestic Goddess

Weekly Geeks Q&A:

1. J.D. Salinger - Catcher In The Rye

Unfortunately, I still have the below outstanding:

Reviews:

1. Terry Pratchett - A Hat Full Of Sky 2. John Le Carre - A Murder Of Quality

Weekly Geeks Q&A:

1. Margaret Atwood - The Handmaid's Tale 2. Philip Pullman - His Dark Materials 3. J.M. Coetzee - Disgrace

Hopefully, by the end of the weekend, I'll be up-to-date. I really don't understand where time flies - I don't waste much time, but I still never seem to have enough. Do you guys ever feel like you're in the same boat? Or, is it just me, and I need to go in for some time-management-therapy?

Sebastian Barry - The Secret Scripture

Shortlisted for the Booker Prize 2008, and winner of the Costa Award 2008, The Secret Scripture explores the lives of both, Dr. Grene (a psychiatrist) and his centerian patient, Roseanne, as both characters reflect on their life from their youngest days, to where are they at this point in time.

Roseanne McNulty has enjoyed the comforts of the Roscommon Mental Hospital for more decades than she can remember. However, the hospital is about to be demolished, and Dr. Grene is re-assessing his patients, to see who are free to roam the outside world, and who need to go through the pains of moving hospitals.

When Dr. Grene breaks the news to her, and says he'll need to revisit her admission to the hospital, she starts reflecting on her life, from her earliest memories, and jots them down, addressing the reader of the 'scripture'. However, she's reluctant to share her memories with her doctor, and keeps the scriptures hidden from the hospital staff, by keeping it under a loose floorboard. Calling herself a cailleach (the old crone of stories, the wise woman, and sometimes a kind of witch), Roseanne tries to keep her writing as accurate as possible, but, as she admits

No one has the monopoly on truth, not even myself.

At the same time, Dr. Grene is dealing with the pains of his personal life, with the estrangement of his wife, despite living in the same house, followed by her death.

We are not wolves, but lambs astonished in the margins of the fields by sunlight and summer. She lost her world, Martha. And I lost mine. No doubt it was well deserved. Whatever her husband suffered was not, and whatever Bet suffered I know for a certainty was not.

Because faithfulness is not a human question, but a divine one.

As Dr. Grene tries finding out more about Roseanne, while battling his own problems, the book progresses into a beautiful piece, with some incredible memories, and some terribly sad ones (and some disturbing ones). The reader cannot help but empathize with both characters, as they struggle to figure out how they got to where they are: from Roseanne's early childhood memories and the silence of her mother, to her father's unfortunate death, to her marriage with Tom McNulty which was followed by an annulment, to the birth of her child, which was taken away from her - a lot of which boiled down to her being Presbyterian. She acknowledges her loneliness, at various stages of her life, and the reader cannot help but feel a tug in their heart as they read her story.

How I wished suddenly for my own mother to seek for me, so fiercely, so sweatingly, to find me again on the lost strand of the world, to rescue me, to recruit others for my rescue, to bring me again to her breast, as that distant mother so obviously ached ached to do with the happy creature in my arms.

With almost poetic writing, Barry brings to life a realistic Ireland during the 1922 civil war, where there's the smell of death and betrayal; where idealism is being compromised, and, innocence lost; where the only thing that matters is being on the side of power, and surviving. The characters are incredibly well-drawn, specially that of Fr. Gaunt - a character I grew to hate as the book progressed, for it was he who seemed to be making life very difficult for Roseanne, just because she did not follow his instructions.

Both, the beauty and the problem of the book lies in the first person narration of Roseanne and Dr. Grene, as they both write in their respective journals. It is easy for the reader to lose track of whose reflections they are reading, and as the stories come together, it gets confusing... specially as, Barry also highlights the meetings between the various characters in the present-day (i.e. the whole book is not written in a reflective manner).

I really enjoyed the book, and Barry's writing flows so lyrically that it makes this a very pleasant reading experience. You feel like the characters are in front of you telling you their stories, and you can actually see all the emotions that must be flowing through them at each moment.

Rating: 4

J.D. Salinger - Catcher In The Rye {Weekly Geeks Q&A}

So, I'm taking ages with the Weekly Geeks' Catching Up, and for that I apologize. The third book I'm going to tackle is also one of my favorites, and I've been reading it every year for god alone knows how long. I also have three copies of this book - one which stays at work, in case I need a break; one that sits on my bookshelf, always ready to be read; and one that's just there in case I lend one of the other copies out.  As you can imagine, I'm quite excited to do this one! Thought of saving the best for last, but... Nah!

On with the questions...

From Jacqueline C:

I love Catcher In the Rye but some people think that it’s very overrated. How do you feel about it?

By my above introduction, I think it's safe to assume I don't think it's overrated at all. Holden Caulfield might be one of the most intriguing characters in literature, and to this date, I think he would be the one fictional character I'd love to have a conversation with. I'm not sure why people find it overrated, to be honest. Is it because they find Caulfield's character annoying? Or, is it because they think the story itself isn't special? Any idea?

From Louise:

Do you think Catcher in the Rye should STILL be on a bannned books list, even though it was probably provocative when it first came it, surely, it shouldn’t be in 2009?

Not really, no. I can see why it was banned, back in the day, with the explicit language, the occasional violence, and sexual content, and of course, the way Caulfield challenges everything society stands for. However, with the influences of television and the internet now days, I think the book is more relevant than ever, because it's basic theme isn't negative. Conversely, it explores the loss of innocence, and how Caulfield wants to save children from the 'phoniness' of adulthood, which is likely to be the end of their innocence. With the internet and TV now-a-days, it's depressing to see how quickly children are growing up, and how, their childhood isn't really one of innocence. I see nine year olds swearing, I see teenagers speaking disrespectfully to their parents, and I see everyone conforming to the same thing... and the one child that tries not to, automatically becomes the butt of all jokes. And I sympathize with that kid. If someone is going to read this book, they will not be more corrupted, or they will not be worse of. Not according to me, anyway.

From Eva:

How does Catcher in the Rye compare to Salinger’s short stories? I love those, but I’m worried that at 23 I’m too old for Catcher…would I just be rolling my eyes?

In my opinion, for what that's worth, Catcher is timeless. I've not read Salinger's short stories, so I can't really compare the two, but... I'm 24, and I absolutely love the book. The thing is, you'll either love the protagonist or hate him. He's a hypocritical phony teenager, battling the world around him, thinking he's surrounded by conformists. To be fair, he does make some very valid points about society. However, towards the end of the book, there's this one scene where he's talking to his sister, and that just did it for me. It was that one scene that makes the book as amazing as it is, and the one scene that shows you where poor Caulfield is coming from. I'd recommend at least giving it a shot - I don't think you'll be disappointed.

Sophie Kinsella - The Undomestic Goddess

I'm not a chick-lit fan at all. The last time I read a book belonging to that genre, I was traumatized and vowed to steer clear of the genre at all costs. So, I surprised myself when I picked this up without someone holding a gun to my head. I needed a mindless book, which would just entertain me for a bit.

And that's exactly what this book did. I haven't read the much-talked about Shopaholic series, and I didn't quite know what to expect with this bestseller.

Samantha Sweeting is a high-flying lawyer, working in one of the most reputable law firms in London. With no work-life balance to boast of, Samantha is focusing on her one and only goal: become a partner at Carter Spink. However, the day she's informally told that she's made partner, she also discovers that she's made a mistake - a mistake that will cost one of Carter Spink's clients £50,000,000. So, what does she do? Run out of the office, head to Paddington, and climb on the first train she sees, which takes her to a London suburb. Coincidentally, the house she knocks on, to get a drink of water, is expecting an interviewee for the position of their domestic help, and they mistake Samantha to be her. Samantha, in first person, says she has never failed an interview in her life, yet. She's not about to start now.

She doesn't have a clue about the basic domestic tasks: from cooking to ironing, from cleaning to laundering. However, she attempts to give it a go, and what ensues is total disaster: Putting the chickpeas in the oven to make hummus, taking the clothes out of the washing machine to discover they are all pink, and, ordering sandwiches from caterers just because she can't slice bread. However, she finds help in the gardener, Nathaniel, and his mother, Iris. The latter offers to teach her the basics of household work, and typically, Samantha being a fast learner, is cooking gourmet meals in a couple of weeks. There's a love story (duh!), where Samantha has a crush on Nathaniel, and he's interested in her as well... (and they live happily ever after - no surprises there, I guess?)

The book's an easy read, and does what it says on the tin (or the cover, in this case). It's unrealistic in a number of ways, like, would a high-powered successful lawyer really make a break for it over one mistake, or try and resolve it and keep her job? There's no room for mistakes, but is absconding really the answer? To make it even more unrealistic, becoming the house-help to pretentious socialites? Then, I'll concede that slicing bread is a tough job, but, can someone, as intelligent as Samantha is made out to be, really not figure out how to use the oven, or the washing machine? What about ironing - it's kind-of obvious what needs to be done, even if you've never done it?*

Rating: 2.5

*I've never ironed a single item until I started working three years ago. I had one catastrophe, where I ruined a shirt, but, other than that, nothing!

Alice Walker - The Color Purple {Weekly Geeks Q&A}

wg-sticky-url6Last week's Weekly Geeks encouraged us to ask the blog readers to ask questions about books we're reading/books we've read, and not yet completed. I'm running extremely late, but, I am finally getting down to doing this. I was asked the below questions:
From Becky:

The Color Purple. Did you enjoy it? Would you recommend it? Is it easy to read or more intimidating? Have you seen the movie? If you have, which did you prefer the book or the movie? Did you have a favorite character? How about a favorite quote? Will you be seeking out any other Alice Walker books?

Yes, I did enjoy the book, and I think it's definitely worth a read. It provides the reader with an insight into life in the South in those times: oppressed women, abusive men, judgmental society. The story is told through the eyes of Celie, a girl of 14 (when the book begins), who has suffered a fair bit; being raped by the man she calls 'father', being forced to marry a man significantly older than herself who is in love with a famous blues singer (Shug Avery), and being separated from her sister, Nettie. It's the exploration of these subjects that make the book a little difficult to read, as you can't help but feel your heart go out to poor Celie, who writes her story to 'God', as she has been told never to tell about her abuse to another person.

My favorite character, trite as it may sound, was Shug: a blues singer, who's condemned by society, for her lavish ways; a strumpet in short skirts, smoking cigarettes, drinking gin. Singing for money, and taking other women mens. Talk about slut, hussy, heifer, streetcleaner. However, Shug doesn't let all this bog her down, but instead, aspires to enjoy life, unlike most of the other women of the time. She's also compassionate, friendly, and becomes a savior of sorts to Celie.

As for a favorite quote... while there are a couple which highlight Shug's attitude, I think this one will give you an insight into Celie's head, as she writes her story:

Dear God,

He act like he can't stand me no more. Say I'm evil an always up to no good. He took my other little baby, a boy this time. But I don't think he kilt it. I think he sold it to a man an his wife over Monticello. I got breasts full of milk running down myself. He say Why don't you look decent? Put on something. But what I'm sposed to put on? I don't have nothing.

I keep hoping he fine somebody to marry. I see him looking at my little sister. She scared. But I say I'll take care of you. With God help.

Unfortunately, I haven't seen the movie - in fact, I didn't even know there was a movie, so...

Regarding seeking out more of Alice Walker - yes, I probably will. Her other books seem to have good reviews as well, but I guess I just haven't gotten around to doing so yet!

From Louise:

I tried reading The Color Purple a few months ago, but could not find head nor tail in it. I only read a couple of pages. Should I have kept it and continued (as in “it will all become clear a few more pages into the book)?

I think so. It's one of those books, where the narrative just drifts into the story, and then, you easily get yourself lost into it, sympathizing with Celie, and hoping she finds happiness eventually.

From Dreamybee:

I have same questions about The Color Purple as some of the other commenters. I’ve only ever seen the movie but I thought it was great, and it’s a movie that stands up over time. It was just as good a couple years ago as it was when it came out in 1985. Have you seen the movie and how does it compare to the book? If not, does the book stand up over time?

I haven't seen the movie, so, I can't really comment on the movie-book comparison. The book does stand up over time. It's a 'historical' book, in a manner of speaking - talking about a time, place and society which has existed in the 'past'. As one of the comments on the back says:

The Color Purple is a work to stand beside literature for any time and any place. It needs no category other than the fact that it's superb. {Rita Mae Brown}

From Eva:

Did you find The Color Purple difficult to read? I’m not super-good with books written in dialect, so I’m a little afraid of it. But I enjoyed Their Eyes Were Watching God earlier this year; if you’ve read that one, how do they compare?

Haven't read Their Eyes Were Watching God, so can't really comment. However, I do think the 'dialect' is what made this book more 'real' than anything else. It can get occasionally awkward to read, and you may have to re-read a line or two over again, to ensure you haven't misinterpreted anything. By your comment, you recommend Their Eyes Were Watching, so I'll definitely try and check it out.

From Jodie:

Which characters did you like the most in The Colour Purple? How did you feel about Mr by the end of the book?

I've answered the first part above, in detail.

As for Mr. -, it's a tough question. I hated him for most of the book, simply because he came across as a selfish chauvinistic sadistic abusive man, and I couldn't possibly have a lower opinion of people like that! I guess, putting it in context, many men at that time (and place) were similar, although I wouldn't say that makes it alright. However, I think, by the end of the book, he did try and redeem himself, which helps some... just not enough. Again, I find it very difficult to forgive such things, so... it might just be me!

So, my questions:

Is there any character you held in utmost contempt? and, What do you think the most defining quality of Shug was? And, the stereotype: did you enjoy the book?

Booking Through Thursday - Sci-Fi/Fantasy

btt2This week, on Booking Through Thursday: One of my favorite sci-fi authors (Sharon Lee) has declared June 23rd Fantasy and Science Fiction Writers Day.

As she puts it:

So! In my Official Capacity as a writer of science fiction and fantasy, I hereby proclaim June 23 Science Fiction and Fantasy Writers Day! A day of celebration and wonder! A day for all of us readers of science fiction and fantasy to reach out and say thank you to our favorite writers. A day, perhaps, to blog about our favorite sf/f writers. A day to reflect upon how written science fiction and fantasy has changed your life.

So … what might you do on the 23rd to celebrate? Do you even read fantasy/sci-fi? Why? Why not?

Considering 23rd is a Tuesday, I'll probably be working, and the day will pass me by. I am reading a fantasy book at the moment (Terry Pratchett - A Hat Full Of Sky), but I reckon I'll be done with it by tomorrow. I do have a couple of books of Garth Nix's The Abhorsen Chronicles lined up (only read Sabriel), so I might end up reading that. I also intend to read Orson Scott Card's Ender's Game, as part of the Take A Chance challenge.

I don't read as much sci-fi/fantasy as I'd like to, to be honest. It's a genre I enjoy, and it's incredible to lose myself in a fantastic world, of endless possibilities and infinite magic. Of course, at the same time, you have a full range of dystopian/post-apocalyptic books, which is something I'm quite fascinated by. From Orwell's 1984 to Bradbury's Fahrenheit 451, from Atwood's The Handmaid's Tale to McCarthy's The Road.

My dabble with fantasy has not been extensive; focusing mostly on the usual suspects, like Philip Pullman's His Dark Materials, The Chronicles of Narnia, The Hobbit, and Harry Potter. As a teenager, I loved RL Stine, Enid Blyton and the like; and like any child, adored fairy tales, which are essentially fantasy, no?

Sci-fi, again, there's The Hitchhiker's Guide To The Galaxy, which I absolutely adored, from the first page. I quite like the Star Wars series, and there was a time I used to read Michael Crichton religiously. Of course, you've got Arthur C. Clarke and Carl Sagan as well. Unfortunately, I don't think I've done much experimental reading here, so.... it's a shame. Maybe something I should do?

How about you? Do you have any favorite sci-fi/fantasy book? Do you enjoy the genre? And, are you planning on doing something special to celebrate the Science Fiction and Fantasy Day?

Musing Mondays - Prizes

This week's Musing Mondays asks:

Do you feel compelled to read prize-winning (Giller/Booker/Pulitzer etc) books? Why, or why not? Is there, perhaps, one particular award that you favour? (question courtesy of MizB)

'Compelled', no. 'Inclined', yes.

There are way too many books out there, and try as I might, I'm never going to read all of them, which is quite depressing. So, resorting to an old cliche, life's too short to read bad books. More oft' than not, a prize-winner is not going to be 'bad', so, it's relatively safe.

That said, if I like the look of a book, award-winning or not, I will pick it up. I don't need to see Sunday Times Best Seller or, Costa Book Awards Winner on the cover to convince me. Sometimes, these will disappoint, and sometimes they'll be fantastic, and that's something I've made my peace with. It's not that I've enjoyed all the prize-winners (case in point: The Gathering) I've read. In fact, I tend to feel more let down when I don't enjoy a prize-winner, than when I don't enjoy just another book off the shelf.

I think I lean more towards the winners of the Booker Prize, but I don't quite know why. It's almost done subconsciously... However, last couple of years, I've been picking up books by authors who have won the Nobel Prize, and so far, I haven't had a bad experience. (There you go, I've probably jinxed it now!)

How about you? Do you have a favorite prize? Or, a favorite prize-winner?

Books for the 'Take A Chance' Challenge

ChanceChallengeSo, I finally switched my 'lazy' button off, and decided to shortlist the books for the Take A Chance challenge, which I'd blogged about earlier.

Unfortunately, it doesn't run very long, and hence, the shortlist of books that I'll be 'taking a chance' on. I'm quite looking forward to starting with this, soon - hopefully in a couple of days.

1. Random Book Selection : John Christopher - The Death of Grass

2. Random Word {Sky} : Terry Pratchett - A Hat Full Of Sky

3. Birth Year Book {1985} : Orsan Scott Card - Ender's Game

4. Judge A Book By Its Cover : John Le Carre - A Murder Of Quality

5. Phoning An Author {Hill} : Susan Hill - The Beacon

6. Public Spying : Gabriel Garcia Marquez - News Of A Kidnapping

7. Random Bestseller {Year : 1999 | Birthday : May 6} : David Guterson - East of the Mountains

8. Lit Riff : Diminished - REM

9. Poetic Review : The Sisterhood Of The Traveling Pants

10. Movie/Book Comparison : Harry Potter and the Half Blood Prince

Has anyone read the above? Am I in for a pleasant ride, or an unpleasant one? Do you have any preferences for #8 (Lit Riff) and #10 (Movie/Book comparison)? I haven't heard of four of the above books, and already have two of them, so... it should be an unpredictable blast and a half.

Thanks again, Jenners!

Booking Through Thursday - Niche

btt2 There are certain types of books that I more or less assume all readers read. (Novels, for example.)

But then there are books that only YOU read. Instructional manuals for fly-fishing. How-to books for spinning yarn. How to cook the perfect souffle. Rebuilding car engines in three easy steps. Dog training for dummies. Rewiring your house without electrocuting yourself. Tips on how to build a NASCAR course in your backyard. Stuff like that.

What niche books do YOU read?

So, some of you might already know I'm a geek. Subsequently, this might not come as a very big surprise, but, please, bear with me. I've tried to make this post bright and colorful, with pictures, to make it slightly less 'geeky'. Here goes... My 'niche' books are on.... Java! Nope, not coffee. Nope, not the island. Yes, you got it - the programming language.

Those are the books I have at hand right now, at home. While some of them are purely for reference, I do tend to read some of them, just to get a better understanding of the best coding practices. I absolutely hate EJB - and if you've ever had the traumatic experience of dealing with them, you'll probably agree with me!

However, I've been teaching myself multithreading, and concurrency, in the recent past. Both important, right - I mean, you wouldn't want a single-threaded application for everything, right? 'Taming Java Threads' is probably one of the best books I've ever read, both, in terms of understanding java threads, and in terms of best practices.

What remains one of my favorite things, is Spring! I've done a couple of really cool projects using the Spring framework, and I bought a book on it, just to see how it fits together. Now that I'm relatively comfortable with Spring, it's time to move on to Hibernate?

Note: need to learn more about the Spring GUI framework as well. I did want to use that for something a year or so back, but it didn't quite pan out. :(

Aside from java (and other geekery), I love reading books on:

  1. Photography
  2. Travel - either travel journals or travelogues
  3. Art (and Sculpture)
  4. Philosophy

How about you? Do you have a geek side? Or, are there any books that you tend to read which no one else around you does?

Happy Thursday, and roll on weekend.

Salman Rushdie - Midnight's Children

The winner of the Booker Prize in 1981, the Booker of Bookers in 1993, and the Best of the Booker in 2008, this book is much-acclaimed and highly recommended. The New York Times claims:

The literary map of India has to be redrawn... Midnight's Children sounds like a continent finding its voice.

And, I can't even refute that for argument's sake, because this epic novel explores the history of Indian independence, of the Indo-China war, the Emergency, blackouts, the Partition, the emergence of Bangladesh, and essentially, it's a history of the Indian sub-continent from the time of its birth. But, what makes this novel truly historical is its protagonist: Saleem Sinai, born exactly at the stroke of the midnight hour, when the world slept and, India awoke to life and freedom, and the other 'midnight children' - children born between midnight and 1 am on the day of India's independence. One thousand and one of them. These children are all special, gifted. While one can travel through time, another can travel via any reflective surface. There's a witch, and there's a girl so beautiful that her beauty blinds anyone who sees her face. Someone else can changes sexes at will. But, of course, the most potent of gifts comes to Saleem, born exactly at midnight - the gift of telepathy, as well as, being able to 'conference' in all the midnight's children, and allowing them to communicate through him. And his nemesis, Shiva, who ironically enough, is born in the same hospital at exactly the same time. While Saleem was the offspring of a Hindu street-singer, Shiva was born into a affluent Kashmiri family. However, typically, a nurse made the switch, thereby changing the destiny of the two most potent Midnight Children, who would be mortal enemies until the end. While Saleem's birth was celebrated, with a letter from the then Prime Minister, saying his life would always be entwined with his country's, Shiva's birth was not celebrated nation-wide!

So, who were the Midnight's Children? What did they signify?

Reality can have metaphorical content; that does not make it less real. A thousand and one children were born; there were a thousand and one possibilities which had never been present in one place at one time before; and there were a thousand and one dead ends. Midnight's children can be made to represent many things, according to your point of view; they can be seen as the last throw of everything antiquated and retrogressive in our myth-ridden nation, whose defeat was entirely desirable in the context of a modernizing, twentieth-century economy; or as the true hope of freedom, which is now forever extinguished; but what they must not become is the bizarre creation of a rambling diseased mind. No: Illness is neither here nor there.

However, this book does not trace the life of all one thousand and one children, or the five hundred and eighty one that survived. In fact it focuses solely on Saleem, the narrator, and the thirty-one years of his life. And the life of his parents and grandparents. An astrologer predicted Saleem's fortunes (or, shall we say misfortunes, for he was both, the master and the victim of his time) before his birth:

A son... such a son! A son, who will never be older than his motherland - neither older nor younger. ... There will be two heads - but you shall only see one - there will be knees and a nose, a nose and knees. Newspaper praises him, two mothers raise him! Bicyclists love him - but crowds will shove him. Sisters will weep; cobra will creep... Washing will hide him - voices will guide him! Friends mutilate him - blood will betray him! Spittoons will brain him - doctors will drain him - jungle will claim him - wizards reclaim him! Soldiers will try him, tyrants will fry him... He will have sons without having sons. He will be old before he is old! And he will die before he is dead!

Sounds complicated, right? The above pretty much sums up the story. If you think it's confusing, it's because it is. A tryst with destiny, a dance with fate and he seems singly responsible for a multitude of historical events in India, post-independence: be it the emergence of Gujarat and Maharashtra, or the Indo-Pak wars, the politics, or even the Emergency period!

You would think that the Midnight's Children would unite, to do some good, to do their nation proud. But, India at the time, seemed to be in a chaotic state of class differences, where people of the various castes did not interact with one another. And, there was a bigger problem: Saleem was their only mode of communication, and once he discovered how he and Shive had swapped destinies, he was reluctant to open the Midnight's Children network again, lest his arch-enemy discovered how his affluent birth had been denied. So, the children lived in denial, hiding their gifts, not interacting with one another, and thereby letting the nation succumb to an apparent greater evil, which would be the end of the Children.

Yes, it's a complex plot, and it's a difficult read. Rushdie's writing is convoluted, and he has literally created his own language and grammar rules. From not using commas, to using words like 'nearlynine' and 'almosteight'. Towards the latter half of the book, there are chunks where in the same paragraph, he refers to himself in both, first and third, person, making the book more difficult to read than it should be. But then again, with my past experiences with Rushdie, this isn't altogether surprising.

The book's interesting, gripping, and colorful. It shows you a historical India, tainted with its new-found independence, and corruption. It gives you an insight into the culture of the country, and the lifestyle. The fascination with Europeans and Americans, and the emphasis on 'black' being unattractive.

However, what I really loved about the book was the role of Padma - a role so effortlessly and artistically worked in, that it actually helped me through the first couple of hundred pages. So, who is she? Padma is physically present as Saleem is writing his story. Through the book, we are allowed a glimpse into the psyche and emotions of Saleem, as he narrates his story, battling his past, and simultaneously attempting to adhere to the truth as much as possible. However, Saleem is prone to digressing, and often, initially, I found that I wasn't quite sure where the book was going. And, that's where Padma steps in: she calls him on it.

But here is Padma at my elbow, bullying me back into the world of linear narrative, the universe of what happened next: 'At this rate,' Padma complains, 'you'll be two hundred years old before you manage to tell about your birth.'

or,

You better get a move on or you'll die before you get yourself born.

Honestly, at the time I was reading this portion, I was hoping the narrator would bring his meanderings to a close, and move on with the story. What's amazing is, this allows both: digressions, and a gentle push back into the story line.

This is an amazing work of literature, and I fully think it deserves to win both, the Booker of Bookers and the Best of the Booker. Volume, story, historical value and literary significance - all in abundance.

Overall rating: 9/10.